>I'm guessing because Rule 3, "Posts promoting the treatment must include research or evidence based practice. No cures." What does promoting means? If they're not taking any monetary benefits from it, is it even a promotion? >But without proper research to back it, it feels almost like dropping bits of rice into a stadium of starving people. Everyone in stuttering community knows that scientific community doesn't care much about stuttering research, because it's not a life threating disorder. How is it possible for people to share research if all they're sharing is - their observations? This feels wrong to me.