I got to about half of them, some I can relate to but others seem like it's from a non stutteter that's missing what we know from inside that isn't shown outside.  But though I thought the one above was more aligned with me, since it correcting it, I'm not sure anymore.  Bits of some, others are too vague.  And it's too many to go through at this point.  I'm kind of stunned that there can be so many that have gone through a good scientific method and peer review...that actually worries me that the peer review process isn't so good with stutterering reviews because the reviewers themselves don't know so what can they correct?  No wonder it's so many :-/