Thanks man for being open-minded. Like I said in my other comments, I'm still working on it and will update my thread. Well, it's totally fine with me; people can perceive my thread as whatever, but I just found it a little bit unfair if I'm accused of spreading false information while I have legit references to back-up my argument while they cited a website. Cute. With easy access to information from MIT, Harvard, Coursera, etc, these days, perhaps even a college drop-out can be more knowledgeable than a Ph.D., ​ "So, the post itself was the encouragement for people to contact you, which makes people think it was a sales pitch." no man, I wrote it below on my thread I will give an update if there's any, so people actually do not have to contact me. This was intended to be a diary/logbook for me something like that, which ofc I would not do it anymore given the negative sentiments. But again I'm surprised by the lack of receptivity. If neurons activities in the brain could only be traced by using a sophisticated tech around a decade ago, what else has not been found or invented?