My opinion is that you're advocating a position that sounds interesting in theory, but is backed up by what research? Secondly, that you rely on a lot of unquestioned premises yourself. To be honest, this reminds me of neuro linguistic programming in that it's a bunch of psychobabble about self-improvement that sounds reasonable on the surface (if you accept their premise) but isn't evidence based at all. We can converse all day on meanings, but we have to trade in what works.