I wouldn't say you're spreading lies and misinformation in any way, shape, or form. You have never made any specific claims or advertised yourself in a manner that you may potentially benefit from. However, some of the criticism is warranted. Glaring flaws in your understanding and writing are quite evident. Firstly, it's clear you haven't stopped to think and understand the neurochemistry for neurochemistry, the biology for biology, and so forth. One example is associating dopamine to acceptance. 'Acceptance' is a social construct we've attached meaning to. There is no objective definition for it. It's rather ambiguous and people tend to see it as it fits them. Dopamine is a MOLECULE which binds to and activates CELL SURFACE RECEPTORS. These chemical interactions happen on a physical level and independent of human perception. You can't attach your semantic understanding of concepts to a molecule in any meaningful form. Secondly, your scientific thinking needs working on. a) You need to learn critical thinking skills so you become able to spot logical fallacies and cognitive biases in reasoning. Sometimes you fail to distinguish correlation from causation. b) You need to learn the scientific method so that you become able to formulate questions and properly form hypotheses by developing testable predictions and design experiements to test your hypotheses. c) Work on your research skills to learn methodologies so that you can understand qualitative vs. quantitative research and appropriate applications. Lacking in these aspects goes mostly to your own detriment rather than the community here. And it's truly a waste to put all this time and effort without developing the proper lens of understanding because then your time and effort can count for much more.