Again, *you all seem to misunderstand what I'm saying.* **Again, for the third time,...** **I think that THE DESIGN ITSELF IS A BRILLIANT IDEA.** I'm not disputing, *that it effectively shows* ***the act of stuttering.*** But if any of you had even decided to check, *this organization has registered* ***EVERY SINGLE SPELLING*** **for "stutter"** they have placed on this poster campaign **as a valid web address to reach** **"**[**stutter.ca**](https://stutter.ca)**"** That is a big part *of their attempt to be* *accessible to their intended audience,* **Stutterers who need help and resources.** But Stutterers **DO NOT HAVE A PROBLEM typing words correctly!** ***THEY DON"T NEED 410,000 ways to spell*** ***"stutter" to reach the website.*** Dyslexics are the ones, *who have a problem reading, spelling,* ***and typing words properly.*** This campaign's solution for accessibility **would work for a dyslexia support website.** *Having multiple ways to spell "dyslexia"* ***and still be able to reach that website,*** **would be helpful for dyslexia sufferers.** As a graphic designer, *who specializes in information design,* ***I have done many accessibility design projects.*** **I care for disabled and special needs people** **in my everyday life.** I am hyper aware **how to address accessibility issues.** What I am saying is, *that this campaign's attempt to be accessible* ***WORKS FOR THE WRONG AUDIENCE.*** If you don't get that, **you are ignoring** **and not addressing the actual problem** ***that Stutterers have of being understood.*** If this poster campaign **directed stutterers** **to a call center,** but staffed by people who are patient ***and used verbal prediction technology*** **to anticipate the words** that the Stutterer themselves is trying to say, *same as the auto-correction that we already have,* ***when we are typing on our smart phones,...*** **That would actually be useful to these Stutterers.**