" I'm afraid I'm going to have a repetition so I'll just shove/speed through this word so it doesn't happen."" Yes agree. To translate your sentence to meta: 1A: I will do repetition > shove/speed through word 1B: cause > effect In my previous comment I was referring to another meta: 1A: condition: 'I will escape a block' > so I will do repetition 1B: cause > effect ​ So the complete picture would be: 1A: condition (this is what I was referring to) 1B: core behavior 1C: intervention ​ Conclusion: You drew the conclusion that 1C causes the block. In my opinion, if we consider only this model (1a b c), then I think that 1A causes the block (not 1C). My argument is that the condition causes a core behavior, not the intervention. Why do you think that 1C is the cause of a block?