Point #2 is excellent. I'd like to tack on an opinion of mine that goes along with it somewhat. I've always felt that most fluency techniques are far from the actual "fluency" that we all hope to "achieve." What many people want/expect from speech therapy is a magical cure that makes them talk like other people and not have to think about it. But in reality speech therapy offers tricks to get the words out. Slow, slurred, easy-onset speech is surely "flowing," but is it "fluent"? Pausing every few words is probably going to make your speech consistent, albeit robotic. Using a sing-song voice might yield similar results to actual singing, but who feels like singing all the time? When I was in speech therapy I did not like any of this because none of them were my actual voice. The best "therapy" for me was to become a good presenter *in spite* of my stuttering instead of trying not to stutter while presenting, which brings me back to the point that ShutupPussy was making. The two things are not mutually exclusive. In retrospect, all of my "bad" presentations were due to nervousness and fear of stuttering; take away the fear and you've got a good presentation that includes stuttering. Food for thought. If you want to take the offer, more power to you, and best of luck. But it sounds to me like your company isn't being terribly accepting of your stutter, which is just kind of shitty.